MERN
vs LAMP
We
are in a time where billions of websites are already out on the search engine,
and 3 new websites are created within every second. Indeed, the
competition is at its peak in the market now, and it’s time to adapt to the
change; otherwise, our business will be left behind in this soaring
competition.
That’s
why businesses found MERN stack a better choice than LAMP for many reasons. It
might be time to switch from LAMP to MERN to get more out of the tech stack.
LAMP has some significant disadvantages compared to its competitor MERN.
My
blog post explores why you might want to make the switch and how to do it if
you decide it’s the right decision for your company or organization. So, let’s
get started.
MERN vs LAMP — The Detailed Comparison:
1.
Operating System: Which one uses a better operating system, LAMP or MERN?
The
operating system used in the LAMP stack is “Ubuntu”, while the MERN stack uses
a combination of five different technologies, i.e., Node.js, Express.js,
AngularJS, MongoDB, and Node Package Manager (NPM). But when it comes to which
one is better, they both run on the Linux operating system. The reason is that
the MERN stack uses newer versions of each technology in its framework, which
makes it better, stable, faster, and much easier to manage, especially during
deployment.
LAMP
Stack was initially developed for Unix-like operating systems, so it can run on
any platform where PHP works without significant problems. But the MERN stack
is far better since it uses the latest version of Node.js, which makes it
cross-platform and can run on any platform with JavaScript support without
problems.
Key
Takeaway
LAMP
— It uses older versions of
backend languages like PHP, which can be a problem when compatibility with
newer frameworks.
MERN
— It uses the latest Node.js
in its stack, making it faster and more stable. Also, this ensures that it is
prepared for the upcoming competitions.
It
has been noticed that the MERN stack has a huge advantage over LAMP due to
newer versions, speed, stability, ease of use, and more than one language that
can be used for development. Thus, the demand for MERN stack
development companies has sky-rocketed.
Winner:
MERN
2.
App Type: Which one is better, LAMP or MERN?
The
app type used in the LAMP stack is “Dynamic”, while the MERN stack uses a
combination of three different types: “Static”, “SOAP”, and “WCF/RESTful”.
When
comparing LAMP with the MERN stack, we consider the services rendered as
“WCF/RESTful” as dynamic since they can be customized according to user
requirements. WCF is more like a framework, and REST is an architectural style
that makes it easy to adopt.
The
other two types-SOAP and RESTful services, are “Static” in nature. SOAP is a
protocol for XML-based requests and responses, while RESTful services use the
HTTP protocol to access the web service.
LAMP
uses a dynamic app type while MERN stack uses three types of app type: Static,
WCF/RESTful, and SOAP. Since all three app types are dynamic, the MERN stack
has a huge advantage over LAMP.
Key
Takeaway
LAMP
- Best for handling heavy
traffic, dynamic data, and client-side web apps.
MERN
- A better choice than LAMP
for handling heavy databases, dynamic data, and client-side web apps.
Winner: MERN
3.
Lifetime: Whose is longer, MERN or LAMP?
The
lifetime of both applications has a huge difference. Though it depends on
several web development companies you have hired, we will
compare them based on general parameters.
The
first parameter is that LAMP has been around longer than the MERN stack. It
means that many companies and developers have gone through many experiences
while developing applications with the LAMP stack. In addition, more people
share their code with others since it is built on an open-source platform.
The
second parameter is that the MERN stack will be upgraded now and then with
every new update of Node.js, making it faster, more stable, and secure,
resulting in a better user experience. Therefore, the lifetime of the LAMP
stack decreases over time due to these updates of Node.js.
Key
Takeaway
LAMP
— It has been around for
longer than the MERN stack and has many companies and developers who have gone
through lots of experiences while developing applications.
MERN — It has an advantage over LAMP due to
faster updates which decrease its lifetime
Winner: MERN
4.
Traffic: Which can handle more, LAMP or MERN?
The
MERN stack is indeed super fast and quite reliable. But when it comes to the
massive amount of data, heavy requests, speed, and stability.
The
MERN stack is the choice of many companies. It has a significant advantage over
LAMP because it can handle both static and dynamic data from databases which
helps in high-level traffic. But since it uses Node.js, which is not very
compatible with a massive amount of data storage or heavy requests, it loses
its edge over LAMP.
The
LAMP stack is the best choice for handling heavy traffic and high load due to
MySQL compatibility. Also, since it can handle both static and dynamic requests
from databases makes it a better option than MERN.
Key
Takeaway
LAMP - Best for handling heavy traffic, dynamic
data, and client-side web apps.
MERN - Best for handling heavy databases and
static data management.
Winner: LAMP
5.
Client & Server Side: Is MERN a better choice for a client or server-side
or LAMP?
Client-side
web application has many advantages over server-side applications, making their
development easy and fast. The first advantage of a client-side application is
being lightweight, so it will be speedy if you have a good internet connection.
It also has the great advantage of tracking user behaviour and analyzing the
data in real-time, making it more dynamic.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— It has less speed, faster
updates which decreases its lifetime, and fewer options for client-side
development.
LAMP
— The best choice for
developing a client-side web app, with MERN being a close second.
Winner: LAMP
6.
Dynamic or Static: Is MERN or LAMP a better choice for the data type?
Both
are almost equally capable of handling that task regarding static data. But
when we consider dynamic web pages that require some server feedback while the
page is being loaded, things get complicated with both the stack.
There
are many instances where the content of a web page frequently changes, thus
making it hard to predict what type of data will be served to the user. For
this kind of task, a MERN developer would have to write code that can update
pages without reloading them, increasing development time and leaving room for
bugs.
There
are many instances where the content of a web page frequently changes, thus
making it hard to predict what type of data will be served to the user. For
this kind of task, a MERN developer would have to write code that can update
pages without reloading them, increasing development time and leaving room for
bugs.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— Requires dynamic data
updating, whereas static data is not a problem.
LAMP
— It has the edge over MERN
due to many tools used for static data management.
Winner: LAMP
7.
Training: Whether MERN or LAMP a better option for learning?
Since
the LAMP stack is quite old, many developers have gone through training
sessions. Not only that, but there are also many books written about the LAMP
stack by experts that help beginners learn more effectively.
On
the other hand, MERN has become quite popular in a short time, and thus some
fewer developers know the MERN stack. However, MERN web developers in the
market provide better services.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— It is pretty new in the
market, so fewer developers know the MERN stack.
LAMP
— It is quite old in the
market, making it easier to find developers who know the LAMP stack.
Winner: LAMP
8.
Maintenance: Which one is more maintenance-friendly?
Both
stacks are equally easy to maintain when it comes to small projects. But when
we consider large-scale projects with multiple developers, MERN has a slight
edge over LAMP since it uses JavaScript, a single language to rule them all.
Thus,
if one developer knows JavaScript proficiently, they can efficiently work for
both frontend and backend development without learning separate programming
languages for frontend and backend.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— A better choice for
large-scale projects with multiple developers.
LAMP
— It is easier to find
JavaScript programmers who can work on both the front and backend by using
JavaScript.
Winner: MERN
9.
Security: Which one is more secure, LAMP or MERN?
Both
the LAMP stack and MERN stack are equally secure for small projects. However,
if we consider large-scale projects with multiple developers, MERN has the edge
over LAMP since all developers in MERN use just one language, which is
JavaScript. This makes it easier for them to collaborate and work on the same
project.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— More secure than LAMP for
large-scale projects with multiple developers.
LAMP
— Not so much of a security
concern for small projects.
Winner: MERN
10.
Cost-effectiveness: Which one is more cost-effective?
Both
stacks are cost-effective when it comes to small projects. However, considering
large-scale projects with multiple developers, MERN is a better choice since
JavaScript is a single language, and MERN uses only one web framework,
Express.js.
But
in the case of the LAMP stack, there are different components for frontend and
backend development which means you will have to pay for the licenses of both
frameworks.
Key
Takeaway
MERN- A better choice if cost-effectiveness is a
primary concern.
LAMP- Not so much of a concern if
cost-effectiveness is not a significant issue.
Winner- MERN
11.
Scalability: Is MERN or LAMP a better option when it comes to scaling?
Since
both stacks are more or less the same scalability, the choice depends on
factors like functionality and usability. If your application requires more
features, you can go for the MERN stack, which is easily scalable compared to
the LAMP stack.
Whereas,
if you have a small project, you can go for the LAMP stack with a comparatively
lower learning curve and better performance.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— A better choice for
large-scale projects with multiple developers.
LAMP
— Better suited for small
projects.
Winner: MERN
12.
Community Support: Which one is more supported by the community?
The
LAMP stack is better supported than the MERN stack because of its age. It has
been used for years by developers around the world, and thus it has a large
community that makes it easy to find help if you are stuck somewhere. On the
other hand, MERN has just started building its community, so it has less
support.
Key
Takeaway
LAMP
— It enjoys good community
support.
MERN
— Less support due to being
new, but it’s not a big concern.
Winner: LAMP
13.
Customizability: Can you customize your stack either way?
Both
the LAMP stack and MERN stack are customizable in their ways. However, the LAMP
stack is mainly customizable using add-ons or different PHP frameworks like
Symfony and Zend. On the other hand, MERN can be customized by using hot
reloading, which means you can edit your code without restarting your
application.
Key
Takeaway
LAMP
— You can make
customizations with add-ons or different PHP frameworks.
MERN
— You can make customizations
easily with its hot reloading feature.
Winner: MERN
14.
Performance: Which one is faster?
The
MERN stack is a more feasible choice if speed and performance are your primary
concerns. It has some remarkable frameworks like Express.js, which, in turn,
allows you to make high-performing web applications with ease. On the other
hand, the LAMP stack does not have any framework-specific to back-end
development, and thus it lags behind the MERN stack when it comes to
performance.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— A better choice if speed
and performance is a significant concern
LAMP
— Not so much of a problem
if speed and performance are not a big issue
Winner: MERN
15.
Flexibility: Which one offers more flexibility?
Both
stacks allow you to make flexible web applications. The only difference lies in
the extent of flexibility offered by both these frameworks. MERN stack is a
better choice for full-stack JavaScript development because it provides
excellent flexibility at the backend and frontend levels, meaning you can make
full-fledged JavaScript applications easily. On the other hand, LAMP can make
full-fledged web applications without great flexibility.
Key
Takeaway
MERN
— A better choice for
maximum flexibility.
LAMP
— Not so flexible, but a
good choice if you are looking for a basic PHP framework.
Winner: MERN
So,
do you think the time has come to say goodbye to LAMP and adopt MERN?
The
answer is Yes! Although
both stacks are almost equally good, they have strengths and weaknesses. Thus,
it is wise to consider your project’s demands and then choose. The choice
depends on cost-effectiveness, security, scalability, functionality, usability,
etc.
Also,
please take a closer look at MERN as it’s winning the battle of LAMP Vs MERN!
MERN
is a popular language used in hybrid mobile applications, and it’s gaining a
lot of popularity in recent times. It has made full-stack development easier.
Paired with the right tools, MERN can help you create faster web applications
that are secure.
MERN
stands for MongoDB, Express.js, React.js, and Node.Js.
M-
MongoDB: A
cross-platform and open-source document store database system.
E-
Express.js: An
open-source and lightweight Node.js framework based on Sinatra’s popular web
framework.
R-
React.js: A
JavaScript library for User Interface development.
N-
Node.js: A
platform built on Chrome’s JavaScript runtime for quickly building fast and
scalable network applications.
How
does the MERN stack work?
MERN
is a full-stack JavaScript framework that uses Node.js for the backend and
React.js as the frontend technology. Express is used as the web app framework,
MongoDB stores your data, and Sass is the CSS preprocessor. The MERN stack
works by using a single language- JavaScript.
It
allows developers to use a single language from the backend to the frontend,
ultimately reducing time to market and costs.
In
short, MERN can help you make high-performing web applications by using all its
components.
This
is why MERN is growing in popularity and will continue to gain more users in
the future.
You
can easily make full-stack JavaScript applications using the MERN stack, making
it a winner against LAMP. In addition, it is flexible, easy to learn, and an
open-source framework.
Famous
use cases of MERN:
1.
E-Commerce Applications
MERN
is preferred for eCommerce development because of its MVC structure and great
options like authentication, simple authorization, ORMs, etc.
2.
CRM or Customer Relationship Management System Applications
LinkedIn
uses the MERN stack to allow users to sign in with their LinkedIn credentials
through a mobile application that is fast and easy to use.
3.
Build a Cross-Platform Mobile Game
It’s
a great time to build a cross-platform mobile game because hybrid app
development with the Ionic framework is gaining popularity at a rapid pace.
4.
Data Visualization
iCharts,
the most popular stock market data platform, uses React .js and Node.Js to
present data in an aesthetically pleasing way along with easy navigation.
5.
Personal Websites or Blogs
MERN
is the best choice if your website needs to handle a lot of traffic due to its
full-stack framework with React.js at both frontend and backend levels. It offers
excellent scalability.
Conclusion
MERN
is a better choice if you target a large market because it provides excellent
flexibility at the back-end and front-end levels, which means you can easily
handle various features. On the other hand, LAMP would be a good choice if your
project is simple.
So,
that’s all about the article comparing LAMP vs MERN stack. In case of any
confusion, top IT consulting companies are always there
to help you.
I
hope you guys liked the article. Please give your valuable feedback. Also,
please stay connected with us for more informative articles.
Happy Coding!
There are 0 Comments on this post